International Accounting Standard 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) is set out in paragraphs 1–140 and the Appendix. All the paragraphs have equal authority. IAS 1 should be read in the context of its objective and the Basis for Conclusions, the Preface to IFRS Standards and the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors provides a basis for selecting and applying accounting policies in the absence of explicit guidance. [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 10–12]
1 | This Standard prescribes the basis for presentation of general purpose financial statements to ensure comparability [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.24–2.29] both with the entity’s financial statements of previous periods and with the financial statements of other entities. It sets out overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their content. |
2 | An entity shall apply this Standard in preparing and presenting general purpose financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). |
3 | Other IFRSs set out the recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements for specific transactions and other events. |
4 | This Standard does not apply to the structure and content of condensed interim financial statements [Refer:IAS 34 paragraph 4] prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. However, paragraphs 15–35 apply to such financial statements. This Standard applies equally to all entities, including those that present consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements [Refer:IFRS 10 Appendix A (definition of consolidated financial statements)] and those that present separate financial statements in accordance with IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements [Refer:IAS 27 paragraph 4 (definition of separate financial statements)]. |
5 | This Standard uses terminology that is suitable for profit‑oriented entities, including public sector business entities. If entities with not‑for‑profit activities in the private sector or the public sector apply this Standard, they may need to amend the descriptions used for particular line items in the financial statements and for the financial statements themselves. |
6 | Similarly, entities that do not have equity [Refer:IAS 32 paragraph 16] as defined in IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation (eg some mutual funds) and entities whose share capital is not equity (eg some co‑operative entities) may need to adapt the financial statement presentation of members’ or unitholders’ interests. |
7 | The following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:
General purpose financial statements (referred to as ‘financial statements’) are those intended to meet the needs of users who are not in a position to require an entity to prepare reports tailored to their particular information needs. [Refer:
Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC11–BC13 paragraphs 10–11 for a complete set of financial statements] Impracticable Applying a requirement is impracticable when the entity cannot apply it after making every reasonable effort to do so. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) are Standards and Interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They comprise:
Material: Information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements, which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity. [Note:IFRS Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements (Practice Statement) provides reporting entities with guidance on making materiality judgements when preparing general purpose financial statements in accordance with IFRS Standards. The Practice Statement is non-mandatory guidance developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (Board). It is not a Standard. Therefore, its application is not required to state compliance with IFRS Standards]
Materiality depends on the nature or magnitude of information, or both. An entity assesses whether information, either individually or in combination with other information, is material in the context of its financial statements taken as a whole. Information is obscured if it is communicated in a way that would have a similar effect for primary users of financial statements to omitting or misstating that information. The following are examples of circumstances that may result in material information being obscured:
Assessing whether information could reasonably be expected to influence decisions made by the primary users of a specific reporting entity’s general purpose financial statements requires an entity to consider the characteristics of those users while also considering the entity’s own circumstances. Many existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors cannot require reporting entities to provide information directly to them and must rely on general purpose financial statements for much of the financial information they need. Consequently, they are the primary users to whom general purpose financial statements are directed. Financial statements are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and economic activities and who review and analyse the information diligently. At times, even well-informed and diligent users may need to seek the aid of an adviser to understand information about complex economic phenomena. Notes [Refer:paragraphs 112–138] contain information in addition to that presented in the statement of financial position [Refer:paragraphs 54–80A], statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income [Refer:paragraphs 81–105], statement of changes in equity [Refer:paragraphs 106–110] and statement of cash flows [Refer:paragraph 111]. Notes provide narrative descriptions or disaggregations of items presented in those statements and information about items that do not qualify for recognition in those statements. Other comprehensive income comprises items of income and expense (including reclassification adjustments) that are not recognised in profit or loss as required or permitted by other IFRSs. [Refer:paragraphs 90–96] The components of other comprehensive income include:
Owners are holders of instruments classified as equity. Profit or loss is the total of income less expenses, excluding the components of other comprehensive income. Reclassification adjustments are amounts reclassified to profit or loss in the current period that were recognised in other comprehensive income in the current or previous periods. Total comprehensive income is the change in equity during a period resulting from transactions and other events, other than those changes resulting from transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Total comprehensive income comprises all components of ‘profit or loss’ and of ‘other comprehensive income’. |
8 | Although this Standard uses the terms ‘other comprehensive income’, ‘profit or loss’ and ‘total comprehensive income’, an entity may use other terms to describe the totals as long as the meaning is clear. For example, an entity may use the term ‘net income’ to describe profit or loss. |
8A | The following terms are described in IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and are used in this Standard with the meaning specified in IAS 32:
|
9 | Financial statements are a structured representation of the financial position [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.12–1.14] and financial performance [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 1.15–1.19] of an entity. The objective of financial statements [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 3.2 and Conceptual Framework Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC3.3 and BC3.4] is to provide information about the financial position, financial performance and cash flows [Refer:IAS 7 paragraph 6] of an entity that is useful [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 2.4] to a wide range of users [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2–1.10 and 2.36] in making economic decisions. Financial statements also show the results of the management’s stewardship of the resources entrusted to it. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.22 and 1.23 and Conceptual Framework Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC1.32 and BC1.40] To meet this objective, financial statements provide information about an entity’s:
This information, along with other information in the notes, assists users of financial statements in predicting the entity’s future cash flows and, in particular, their timing and certainty. |
| E1 | [IFRIC® Update, May 2014, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements—issues related to the application of IAS 1’ The Interpretations Committee received a request to clarify the application of some of the presentation requirements in IAS 1. The submitter expressed a concern that the absence of definitions in IAS 1 and the lack of implementation guidance give significant flexibility that may impair the comparability and understandability of financial statements. The submitter provided examples in the following areas:
The Interpretations Committee observed that a complete set of financial statements is comprised of items recognised and measured in accordance with IFRS. The Interpretations Committee noted that IAS 1 addresses the overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their content. It also noted that while IAS 1 does permit flexibility in presentation, it also includes various principles for the presentation and content of financial statements as well as more detailed requirements. These principles and more detailed requirements are intended to limit the flexibility such that financial statements present information that is relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable. The Interpretations Committee observed that securities regulators, as well as some members of the Interpretations Committee, were concerned about the presentation of information in the financial statements that is not determined in accordance with IFRS. They were particularly concerned when such information is presented on the face of the primary statements. The Interpretations Committee noted that it would be beneficial if the IASB’s Disclosure Initiative considered what guidance should be given for the presentation of information beyond what is required in accordance with IFRS. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee determined that it should not propose an Interpretation nor an amendment to a Standard and consequently decided not to add this issue to its agenda.] |
10 | A complete set of financial statements comprises:
An entity may use titles for the statements other than those used in this Standard. For example, an entity may use the title ‘statement of comprehensive income’ instead of ‘statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income’. |
10A | An entity may present a single statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with profit or loss and other comprehensive income presented in two sections. The sections shall be presented together, with the profit or loss section presented first followed directly by the other comprehensive income section. An entity may present the profit or loss section in a separate statement of profit or loss. If so, the separate statement of profit or loss shall immediately precede the statement presenting comprehensive income, which shall begin with profit or loss. |
11 | An entity shall present with equal prominence [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC22] all of the financial statements in a complete set of financial statements [Refer:paragraph 10]. |
12 | [Deleted] |
13 | Many entities present, outside the financial statements, [Refer:paragraph 10] a financial review by management that describes and explains the main features of the entity’s financial performance and financial position, and the principal uncertainties it faces. Such a report may include a review of:
[IFRS Practice Statement Management Commentary provides a broad, non‑binding framework for the presentation of management commentary that relates to financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs.]
|
14 | Many entities also present, outside the financial statements [Refer:paragraph 10], reports and statements such as environmental reports and value added statements, particularly in industries in which environmental factors are significant and when employees are regarded as an important user group. Reports and statements presented outside financial statements are outside the scope of IFRSs. |
15 | Financial statements shall present fairly the financial position, [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.12–1.14] financial performance [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.15–1.19] and cash flows [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 1.20 and IAS 7 paragraph 6] of an entity. Fair presentation requires the faithful representation [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12 and 2.13 and Conceptual Framework Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J] of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2] and recognition criteria [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 5.6–5.11] for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (Conceptual Framework). The application of IFRSs, with additional disclosure when necessary, is presumed to result in financial statements that achieve a fair presentation. |
16 | An entity whose financial statements comply with IFRSs shall make an explicit and unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. An entity shall not describe financial statements as complying with IFRSs unless they comply with all the requirements of IFRSs. [Link toIAS 34 paragraph 2]
|
17 | In virtually all circumstances, an entity achieves a fair presentation by compliance with applicable IFRSs. A fair presentation also requires an entity:
|
| E2 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability' (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
18 | An entity cannot rectify inappropriate accounting policies either by disclosure of the accounting policies used or by notes or explanatory material. |
19 | In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Conceptual Framework, [Refer:paragraph 139S, Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105H(b) and Conceptual Framework paragraph 3.2] the entity shall depart from that requirement in the manner set out in paragraph 20 if the relevant regulatory framework requires, or otherwise does not prohibit, such a departure. |
20 | When an entity departs from a requirement of an IFRS in accordance with paragraph 19, it shall disclose:
|
21 | When an entity has departed from a requirement of an IFRS in a prior period, and that departure affects the amounts recognised in the financial statements for the current period, it shall make the disclosures set out in paragraph 20(c) and (d). |
22 | Paragraph 21 applies, for example, when an entity departed in a prior period from a requirement in an IFRS for the measurement of assets or liabilities and that departure affects the measurement of changes in assets and liabilities recognised in the current period’s financial statements. |
23 | In the extremely rare circumstances in which management concludes that compliance with a requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Conceptual Framework, [Refer:paragraph 139S, Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105H(b) and Conceptual Framework paragraph 3.2] but the relevant regulatory framework prohibits departure from the requirement, the entity shall, to the maximum extent possible, reduce the perceived misleading aspects of compliance by disclosing:
|
24 | For the purpose of paragraphs 19–23, an item of information would conflict with the objective of financial statements [Refer:paragraph 139S, Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105H(b) and Conceptual Framework paragraph 3.2] when it does not represent faithfully [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12 and 2.13] the transactions, other events and conditions that it either purports to represent or could reasonably be expected to represent and, consequently, it would be likely to influence economic decisions made by users of financial statements. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2–1.10 and 2.36] When assessing whether complying with a specific requirement in an IFRS would be so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements set out in the Conceptual Framework, management considers:
|
25 | When preparing financial statements, management shall make an assessment of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 3.9] An entity shall prepare financial statements on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. When management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the entity shall disclose those uncertainties.E3,E4 When an entity does not prepare financial statements on a going concern basis, it shall disclose that fact, together with the basis on which it prepared the financial statements and the reason why the entity is not regarded as a going concern.
|
| E3 | [IFRIC Update, July 2010, Agenda Decision, ‘Going concern disclosure’ The Committee received a request for guidance on the disclosure requirements in IAS 1 on uncertainties related to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. How an entity applies the disclosure requirements in paragraph 25 of IAS 1 requires the exercise of professional judgement. The Committee noted that paragraph 25 requires that an entity shall disclose ‘material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern’. The Committee also noted that for this disclosure to be useful it must identify that the disclosed uncertainties may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Committee noted that IAS 1 provides sufficient guidance on the disclosure requirements on uncertainties related to an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that it does not expect diversity in practice. Therefore, the Committee decided not to add the issue to its agenda.] |
| E4 | [IFRIC® Update, July 2014, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements—disclosure requirements relating to assessment of going concern’ The Interpretations Committee received a submission requesting clarification about the disclosures required in relation to material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Interpretations Committee proposed to the IASB that it should make a narrow-scope amendment to change the disclosure requirements in IAS 1 in response to this issue. At its meeting in November 2013 the IASB discussed the issue and considered amendments proposed by the staff, but decided not to proceed with these amendments and removed this topic from its agenda. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee removed the topic from its agenda. The staff reported the results of the IASB’s discussion to the Interpretations Committee. When considering this feedback about the IASB’s decision, the Interpretations Committee discussed a situation in which management of an entity has considered events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Having considered all relevant information, including the feasibility and effectiveness of any planned mitigation, management concluded that there are no material uncertainties that require disclosure in accordance with paragraph 25 of IAS 1. However, reaching the conclusion that there was no material uncertainty involved significant judgement. The Interpretations Committee observed that paragraph 122 of IAS 1 requires disclosure of the judgements made in applying the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. The Interpretations Committee also observed that in the circumstance discussed, the disclosure requirements of paragraph 122 of IAS 1 would apply to the judgements made in concluding that there remain no material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.] |
26 | In assessing whether the going concern assumption is appropriate, management takes into account all available information about the future, which is at least, but is not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. [Refer:IAS 10 paragraphs 14–16] The degree of consideration depends on the facts in each case. When an entity has a history of profitable operations and ready access to financial resources, the entity may reach a conclusion that the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate without detailed analysis. In other cases, management may need to consider a wide range of factors relating to current and expected profitability, debt repayment schedules and potential sources of replacement financing before it can satisfy itself that the going concern basis is appropriate. |
27 | An entity shall prepare its financial statements, except for cash flow information, using the accrual basis of accounting. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.17-1.19] |
28 | When the accrual basis of accounting is used, an entity recognises items as assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses (the elements of financial statements) when they satisfy the definitions [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2] and recognition criteria [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 5.6–5.17] for those elements in the Conceptual Framework. |
29 | An entity shall present separately each material class of similar items. An entity shall present separately items of a dissimilar nature or function unless they are immaterial. |
30 | Financial statements result from processing large numbers of transactions or other events that are aggregated into classes according to their nature or function. The final stage in the process of aggregation and classification is the presentation of condensed and classified data, which form line items in the financial statements. If a line item is not individually material, it is aggregated with other items either in those statements or in the notes. An item that is not sufficiently material to warrant separate presentation in those statements may warrant separate presentation in the notes. |
30A | When applying this and other IFRSs an entity shall decide, taking into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances, how it aggregates information in the financial statements, which include the notes. An entity shall not reduce the understandability of its financial statements by obscuring material information with immaterial information or by aggregating material items that have different natures or functions. |
31 | Some IFRSs specify information that is required to be included in the financial statements, which include the notes. An entity need not provide a specific disclosure required by an IFRS if the information resulting from that disclosure is not material. This is the case even if the IFRS contains a list of specific requirements or describes them as minimum requirements. An entity shall also consider whether to provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users of financial statements to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance. |
32 | An entity shall not offset assets and liabilities or income and expenses, unless required [Refer:for example, IAS 32 paragraph 42] or permitted by an IFRS. |
33 | An entity reports separately both assets and liabilities, and income and expenses. Offsetting in the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income or financial position, except when offsetting reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, detracts from the ability of users [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2-1.10 and 2.36] both to understand the transactions, other events and conditions that have occurred and to assess the entity’s future cash flows. Measuring assets net of valuation allowances—for example, obsolescence allowances on inventories and doubtful debts allowances on receivables—is not offsetting. |
34 | IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers requires an entity to measure revenue from contracts with customers at the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services. [Refer:IFRS 15 paragraph 47] For example, the amount of revenue recognised reflects any trade discounts and volume rebates the entity allows. An entity undertakes, in the course of its ordinary activities, other transactions that do not generate revenue but are incidental to the main revenue‑generating activities. An entity presents the results of such transactions, when this presentation reflects the substance of the transaction or other event, by netting any income with related expenses arising on the same transaction. For example:
|
35 | In addition, an entity presents on a net basis gains and losses arising from a group of similar transactions, for example, foreign exchange gains and losses or gains and losses arising on financial instruments held for trading. However, an entity presents such gains and losses separately if they are material. [Refer:paragraphs 29–31]
|
36 | An entity shall present a complete set of financial statements [Refer:paragraph 10] (including comparative information) at least annually. When an entity changes the end of its reporting period and presents financial statements for a period longer or shorter than one year, an entity shall disclose, in addition to the period covered by the financial statements:
|
37 | Normally, an entity consistently prepares financial statements for a one‑year period. However, for practical reasons, some entities prefer to report, for example, for a 52‑week period. This Standard does not preclude this practice. |
38 | Except when IFRSs permit or require otherwise, [Refer:IFRS 1 paragraph 21] an entity shall present comparative information in respect of the preceding period for all amounts reported in the current period’s financial statements. An entity shall include comparative information for narrative and descriptive information if it is relevant [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] to understanding the current period’s financial statements.E5 |
| E5 | [IFRIC Update, June 2005, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Comparatives for prospectuses’ The IFRIC considered whether to amend requirements in paragraph 36 (now paragraph 38) of IAS 1 relating to comparative information, because of perceived practical problems in complying with EU requirements for prospectuses. The IFRIC decided not to add the item to its agenda because it believed that the issue involved a difference of approach between IAS 1 and certain regulatory requirements that were not capable of being resolved merely by issuing an interpretation of IAS 1.] |
38A | An entity shall present, as a minimum, two statements of financial position, two statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, two separate statements of profit or loss (if presented), two statements of cash flows and two statements of changes in equity, and related notes. |
38B | In some cases, narrative information provided in the financial statements for the preceding period(s) continues to be relevant in the current period. For example, an entity discloses in the current period details of a legal dispute, the outcome of which was uncertain at the end of the preceding period and is yet to be resolved. Users may benefit from the disclosure of information that the uncertainty existed at the end of the preceding period and from the disclosure of information about the steps that have been taken during the period to resolve the uncertainty. |
38C | An entity may present comparative information in addition to the minimum comparative financial statements required by IFRSs, as long as that information is prepared in accordance with IFRSs. This comparative information may consist of one or more statements referred to in paragraph 10, but need not comprise a complete set of financial statements. When this is the case, the entity shall present related note information for those additional statements. |
38D | For example, an entity may present a third statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (thereby presenting the current period, the preceding period and one additional comparative period). However, the entity is not required to present a third statement of financial position, a third statement of cash flows or a third statement of changes in equity (ie an additional financial statement comparative). The entity is required to present, in the notes to the financial statements, the comparative information related to that additional statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. |
39–40 | [Deleted] |
40A | An entity shall present a third statement of financial position as at the beginning of the preceding period in addition to the minimum comparative financial statements required in paragraph 38A if:
|
40B | In the circumstances described in paragraph 40A, an entity shall present three statements of financial position as at:
|
40C | When an entity is required to present an additional statement of financial position in accordance with paragraph 40A, it must disclose the information required by paragraphs 41–44 and IAS 8. However, it need not present the related notes to the opening statement of financial position as at the beginning of the preceding period. |
40D | The date of that opening statement of financial position shall be as at the beginning of the preceding period regardless of whether an entity’s financial statements present comparative information for earlier periods (as permitted in paragraph 38C). |
41 | If an entity changes the presentation or classification of items in its financial statements, it shall reclassify comparative amounts unless reclassification is impracticable. When an entity reclassifies comparative amounts, it shall disclose (including as at the beginning of the preceding period):
|
42 | When it is impracticable to reclassify comparative amounts, an entity shall disclose:
|
43 | Enhancing the inter‑period comparability of information assists users in making economic decisions, especially by allowing the assessment of trends in financial information for predictive purposes. In some circumstances, it is impracticable to reclassify comparative information for a particular prior period to achieve comparability with the current period. For example, an entity may not have collected data in the prior period(s) in a way that allows reclassification, and it may be impracticable to recreate the information. |
44 | IAS 8 sets out the adjustments to comparative information required when an entity changes an accounting policy [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 14–31 and 50–53] or corrects an error. [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 41–53] |
45 | An entity shall retain the presentation and classification of items in the financial statements from one period to the next unless:
|
46 | For example, a significant acquisition or disposal, or a review of the presentation of the financial statements, might suggest that the financial statements need to be presented differently. An entity changes the presentation of its financial statements only if the changed presentation provides information that is reliableE6 and more relevant [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] to users [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2-1.10 and 2.36] of the financial statements and the revised structure is likely to continue, so that comparability [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.24-2.29] is not impaired. When making such changes in presentation, an entity reclassifies its comparative information [Refer:paragraphs 38–41] in accordance with paragraphs 41 and 42. |
| E6 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
| E7 | [IFRIC® Update, May 2014, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements—issues related to the application of IAS 1’ The Interpretations Committee received a request to clarify the application of some of the presentation requirements in IAS 1. The submitter expressed a concern that the absence of definitions in IAS 1 and the lack of implementation guidance give significant flexibility that may impair the comparability and understandability of financial statements. The submitter provided examples in the following areas:
The Interpretations Committee observed that a complete set of financial statements is comprised of items recognised and measured in accordance with IFRS. The Interpretations Committee noted that IAS 1 addresses the overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their content. It also noted that while IAS 1 does permit flexibility in presentation, it also includes various principles for the presentation and content of financial statements as well as more detailed requirements. These principles and more detailed requirements are intended to limit the flexibility such that financial statements present information that is relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable. The Interpretations Committee observed that securities regulators, as well as some members of the Interpretations Committee, were concerned about the presentation of information in the financial statements that is not determined in accordance with IFRS. They were particularly concerned when such information is presented on the face of the primary statements. The Interpretations Committee noted that it would be beneficial if the IASB’s Disclosure Initiative considered what guidance should be given for the presentation of information beyond what is required in accordance with IFRS. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee determined that it should not propose an Interpretation nor an amendment to a Standard and consequently decided not to add this issue to its agenda. [In December 2014 the Board issued ‘Disclosure Initiative—Amendments to IAS 1’ which made a number of changes to IAS 1, including adding paragraphs 30A, 55A, 85A and 85B to IAS 1]] |
47 | This Standard requires particular disclosures in the statement of financial position or the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, or in the statement of changes in equity and requires disclosure of other line items either in those statements or in the notes. IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows sets out requirements for the presentation of cash flow information. |
48 | This Standard sometimes uses the term ‘disclosure’ in a broad sense, encompassing items presented in the financial statements. Disclosures are also required by other IFRSs. Unless specified to the contrary elsewhere in this Standard [Refer:for example, paragraphs 54 and 82] or in another IFRS, [Refer:for example, IAS 33 paragraph 66] such disclosures may be made in the financial statements. |
49 | An entity shall clearly identify the financial statements and distinguish them from other information in the same published document. |
50 | IFRSs apply only to financial statements, and not necessarily to other information presented in an annual report, a regulatory filing, or another document. Therefore, it is important that users can distinguish information that is prepared using IFRSs from other information that may be useful to users but is not the subject of those requirements. |
51 | An entity shall clearly identify each financial statement and the notes. In addition, an entity shall display the following information prominently, and repeat it when necessary for the information presented to be understandable:
|
52 | An entity meets the requirements in paragraph 51 by presenting appropriate headings for pages, statements, notes, columns and the like. Judgement is required in determining the best way of presenting such information. For example, when an entity presents the financial statements electronically, separate pages are not always used; an entity then presents the above items to ensure that the information included in the financial statements can be understood. |
53 | An entity often makes financial statements more understandable [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.34-2.36] by presenting information in thousands or millions of units of the presentation currency. This is acceptable as long as the entity discloses the level of rounding and does not omit material information. |
54 | The statement of financial position shall include line items that present the following amounts:
|
| E8 | [IFRIC® Update, September 2019, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements—Presentation of Liabilities or Assets Related to Uncertain Tax Treatments’ The Committee received a request about the presentation of liabilities or assets related to uncertain tax treatments recognised applying IFRIC 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments (uncertain tax liabilities or assets). The request asked whether, in its statement of financial position, an entity is required to present uncertain tax liabilities as current (or deferred) tax liabilities or, instead, can present such liabilities within another line item such as provisions. A similar question could arise regarding uncertain tax assets. The definitions in IAS 12 of current tax and deferred tax liabilities or assets When there is uncertainty over income tax treatments, paragraph 4 of IFRIC 23 requires an entity to ‘recognise and measure its current or deferred tax asset or liability applying the requirements in IAS 12 based on taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and tax rates determined applying IFRIC 23’. Paragraph 5 of IAS 12 Income Taxes defines:
Consequently, the Committee observed that uncertain tax liabilities or assets recognised applying IFRIC 23 are liabilities (or assets) for current tax as defined in IAS 12, or deferred tax liabilities or assets as defined in IAS 12. Presentation of uncertain tax liabilities (or assets) Neither IAS 12 nor IFRIC 23 contain requirements on the presentation of uncertain tax liabilities or assets. Therefore, the presentation requirements in IAS 1 apply. Paragraph 54 of IAS 1 states that ‘the statement of financial position shall include line items that present: …(n) liabilities and assets for current tax, as defined in IAS 12; (o) deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets, as defined in IAS 12…’. Paragraph 57 of IAS 1 states that paragraph 54 ‘lists items that are sufficiently different in nature or function to warrant separate presentation in the statement of financial position’. Paragraph 29 requires an entity to ‘present separately items of a dissimilar nature or function unless they are immaterial’. Accordingly, the Committee concluded that, applying IAS 1, an entity is required to present uncertain tax liabilities as current tax liabilities (paragraph 54(n)) or deferred tax liabilities (paragraph 54(o)); and uncertain tax assets as current tax assets (paragraph 54(n)) or deferred tax assets (paragraph 54(o)). The Committee concluded that the principles and requirements in IFRS Standards provide an adequate basis for an entity to determine the presentation of uncertain tax liabilities and assets. Consequently, the Committee decided not to add the matter to its standard-setting agenda.] |
55 | An entity shall present additional line items (including by disaggregating the line items listed in paragraph 54), headings and subtotals in the statement of financial position when such presentation is relevant [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] to an understanding of the entity’s financial position.E9
|
| E9 | [IFRIC® Update, December 2020, Agenda Decision, ‘Supply Chain Financing Arrangements—Reverse Factoring’ The Committee received a request about reverse factoring arrangements. Specifically, the request asked:
In a reverse factoring arrangement, a financial institution agrees to pay amounts an entity owes to the entity’s suppliers and the entity agrees to pay the financial institution at the same date as, or a date later than, suppliers are paid. Presentation in the statement of financial position IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements specifies how an entity is required to present its liabilities in the statement of financial position. Paragraph 54 of IAS 1 requires an entity to present ‘trade and other payables’ separately from other financial liabilities. ‘Trade and other payables’ are sufficiently different in nature or function from other financial liabilities to warrant separate presentation (paragraph 57 of IAS 1). Paragraph 55 of IAS 1 requires an entity to present additional line items (including by disaggregating the line items listed in paragraph 54) when such presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position. Consequently, an entity is required to determine whether to present liabilities that are part of a reverse factoring arrangement:
Paragraph 11(a) of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets states that ‘trade payables are liabilities to pay for goods or services that have been received or supplied and have been invoiced or formally agreed with the supplier’. Paragraph 70 of IAS 1 explains that ‘some current liabilities, such as trade payables… are part of the working capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle’. The Committee therefore concluded that an entity presents a financial liability as a trade payable only when it:
Paragraph 29 of IAS 1 requires an entity to ‘present separately items of a dissimilar nature or function unless they are immaterial’. Paragraph 57 specifies that line items are included in the statement of financial position when the size, nature or function of an item (or aggregation of similar items) is such that separate presentation is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial position. Accordingly, the Committee concluded that, applying IAS 1, an entity presents liabilities that are part of a reverse factoring arrangement:
The Committee observed that an entity assessing whether to present liabilities that are part of a reverse factoring arrangement separately might consider factors including, for example:
Derecognition of a financial liability An entity assesses whether and when to derecognise a liability that is (or becomes) part of a reverse factoring arrangement applying the derecognition requirements in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. An entity that derecognises a trade payable to a supplier and recognises a new financial liability to a financial institution applies IAS 1 in determining how to present that new liability in its statement of financial position (see ‘Presentation in the statement of financial position’). ... Notes to the financial statements ... An entity applies judgement in determining whether to provide additional disclosures in the notes about the effect of reverse factoring arrangements on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Committee observed that:
The Committee noted that making materiality judgements involves both quantitative and qualitative considerations. ... The Committee concluded that the principles and requirements in IFRS Standards provide an adequate basis for an entity to determine the presentation of liabilities that are part of reverse factoring arrangements, the presentation of the related cash flows, and the information to disclose in the notes about, for example, liquidity risks that arise in such arrangements. Consequently, the Committee decided not to add a standard-setting project on these matters to the work plan.] |
55A | When an entity presents subtotals in accordance with paragraph 55, those subtotals shall:
|
56 | When an entity presents current and non‑current assets, [Refer:paragraphs 60–68] and current and non‑current liabilities, [Refer:paragraphs 69–76] as separate classifications in its statement of financial position, it shall not classify deferred tax assets (liabilities) as current assets (liabilities).
|
57 | This Standard does not prescribe the order or format in which an entity presents items. Paragraph 54 simply lists items that are sufficiently different in nature or function to warrant separate presentation in the statement of financial position. In addition:
|
58 | An entity makes the judgement about whether to present additional items separately on the basis of an assessment of:
|
59 | The use of different measurement bases [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 6.4-6.22] for different classes of assets suggests that their nature or function differs and, therefore, that an entity presents them as separate line items. For example, different classes of property, plant and equipment [Refer:IAS 16 paragraph 37] can be carried at cost [Refer:IAS 16 paragraph 30] or at revalued amounts [Refer:IAS 16 paragraph 31] in accordance with IAS 16. |
60 | An entity shall present current and non‑current assets, [Refer:paragraph 66] and current and non‑current liabilities, [Refer:paragraph 69] as separate classifications in its statement of financial position in accordance with paragraphs 66–76 except when a presentation based on liquidity provides information that is reliableE10 and more relevant. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] When that exception applies, an entity shall present all assets and liabilities in order of liquidity. |
| E10 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
61 | Whichever method of presentation is adopted, an entity shall disclose the amount expected to be recovered or settled after more than twelve months for each asset and liability line item that combines amounts expected to be recovered or settled:
|
62 | When an entity supplies goods or services within a clearly identifiable operating cycle, [Refer:paragraph 68] separate classification of current and non‑current assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position provides useful information by distinguishing the net assets that are continuously circulating as working capital from those used in the entity’s long‑term operations. It also highlights assets that are expected to be realised within the current operating cycle, and liabilities that are due for settlement within the same period. |
63 | For some entities, such as financial institutions, a presentation of assets and liabilities in increasing or decreasing order of liquidity provides information that is reliableE11 and more relevant [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] than a current/non‑current presentation because the entity does not supply goods or services within a clearly identifiable operating cycle [Refer:paragraph 68]. |
| E11 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
64 | In applying paragraph 60, an entity is permitted to present some of its assets and liabilities using a current/non‑current classification and others in order of liquidity when this provides information that is reliableE12 and more relevant. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] The need for a mixed basis of presentation might arise when an entity has diverse operations. |
| E12 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
65 | Information about expected dates of realisation of assets and liabilities is useful in assessing the liquidity and solvency of an entity. IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures requires disclosure of the maturity dates of financial assets and financial liabilities. Financial assets include trade and other receivables, and financial liabilities include trade and other payables. Information on the expected date of recovery of non‑monetary assets such as inventories and expected date of settlement for liabilities such as provisions is also useful, whether assets and liabilities are classified as current or as non‑current. For example, an entity discloses the amount of inventories that are expected to be recovered more than twelve months after the reporting period. |
66 | An entity shall classify an asset as current when:
An entity shall classify all other assets as non‑current.
|
| E13 | [IFRIC® Update, June 2005, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Normal operating cycle’ The IFRIC considered an issue regarding the classification of current and non–current assets by reference to an entity's normal operating cycle. It was asked whether the guidance in paragraph 57(a) (now paragraph 66(a)) of IAS 1 was applicable only if an entity had a predominant operating cycle. This is particularly relevant to the inventories of conglomerates which, on a narrow reading of the wording, might always have to refer to the twelve–month criterion in paragraph 57(c) (now paragraph 66(c)) of IAS 1, rather than the operating cycle criterion. The IFRIC decided not to consider the question further because, in its view, it was clear that the wording should be read in both the singular and the plural and that it was the nature of inventories in relation to the operating cycle that was relevant to classification. Furthermore, if inventories of different cycles were held, and it was material to readers' understanding of an entity's financial position, then the general requirement in paragraph 71 (now paragraph 57) of IAS 1 already required disclosure of further information.] |
67 | This Standard uses the term ‘non‑current’ to include tangible, intangible and financial assets of a long‑term nature. It does not prohibit the use of alternative descriptions as long as the meaning is clear. |
68 | The operating cycle of an entity is the time between the acquisition of assets for processing and their realisation in cash or cash equivalents. When the entity’s normal operating cycle is not clearly identifiable, it is assumed to be twelve months. Current assets include assets (such as inventories and trade receivables) that are sold, consumed or realised as part of the normal operating cycle even when they are not expected to be realised within twelve months after the reporting period. Current assets also include assets held primarily for the purpose of trading (examples include some financial assets that meet the definition of held for trading in IFRS 9) and the current portion of non-current financial assets.
|
69 | An entity shall classify a liability as current when:
An entity shall classify all other liabilities as non‑current.
|
70 | Some current liabilities, such as trade payables and some accruals for employee and other operating costs, are part of the working capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle. An entity classifies such operating items as current liabilities even if they are due to be settled more than twelve months after the reporting period. The same normal operating cycle applies to the classification of an entity’s assets and liabilities. When the entity’s normal operating cycle is not clearly identifiable, it is assumed to be twelve months.
|
71 | Other current liabilities are not settled as part of the normal operating cycle, but are due for settlement within twelve months after the reporting period or held primarily for the purpose of trading. Examples are some financial liabilities that meet the definition of held for trading in IFRS 9, bank overdrafts, and the current portion of non-current financial liabilities, dividends payable, income taxes and other non-trade payables. Financial liabilities that provide financing on a long-term basis (ie are not part of the working capital used in the entity’s normal operating cycle) and are not due for settlement within twelve months after the reporting period are non-current liabilities, subject to paragraphs 74 and 75. |
72 | An entity classifies its financial liabilities as current when they are due to be settled within twelve months after the reporting period, even if:
|
72A | An entity’s right to defer settlement of a liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period must have substance and, as illustrated in paragraphs 73–75, must exist at the end of the reporting period. If the right to defer settlement is subject to the entity complying with specified conditions, the right exists at the end of the reporting period only if the entity complies with those conditions at the end of the reporting period. The entity must comply with the conditions at the end of the reporting period even if the lender does not test compliance until a later date. |
73 | If an entity has the right, at the end of the reporting period, to roll over an obligation for at least twelve months after the reporting period under an existing loan facility, it classifies the obligation as non‑current, even if it would otherwise be due within a shorter period. If the entity has no such right, the entity does not consider the potential to refinance the obligation and classifies the obligation as current. |
74 | When an entity breaches a condition of a long‑term loan arrangement on or before the end of the reporting period with the effect that the liability becomes payable on demand, it classifies the liability as current, even if the lender agreed, after the reporting period and before the authorisation of the financial statements for issue, [Refer:IAS 10 paragraphs 3–7] not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach. An entity classifies the liability as current because, at the end of the reporting period, it does not have the right to defer its settlement for at least twelve months after that date. |
75 | However, an entity classifies the liability as non‑current if the lender agreed by the end of the reporting period to provide a period of grace ending at least twelve months after the reporting period, within which the entity can rectify the breach and during which the lender cannot demand immediate repayment. |
75A | Classification of a liability is unaffected by the likelihood that the entity will exercise its right to defer settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the reporting period. If a liability meets the criteria in paragraph 69 for classification as non-current, it is classified as non-current even if management intends or expects the entity to settle the liability within twelve months after the reporting period, or even if the entity settles the liability between the end of the reporting period and the date the financial statements are authorised for issue. However, in either of those circumstances, the entity may need to disclose information about the timing of settlement to enable users of its financial statements to understand the impact of the liability on the entity’s financial position (see paragraphs 17(c) and 76(d)). |
76 | If the following events occur between the end of the reporting period and the date the financial statements are authorised for issue, [Refer:IAS 10 paragraphs 3–7] those events are disclosed as non‑adjusting events in accordance with IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period:
|
76A | For the purpose of classifying a liability as current or non-current, settlement refers to a transfer to the counterparty that results in the extinguishment of the liability. The transfer could be of:
|
76B | Terms of a liability that could, at the option of the counterparty, result in its settlement by the transfer of the entity’s own equity instruments do not affect its classification as current or non-current if, applying IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, the entity classifies the option as an equity instrument, recognising it separately from the liability as an equity component of a compound financial instrument. [Refer:IAS 32 paragraph 28] |
77 | An entity shall disclose, either in the statement of financial position or in the notes, further subclassifications of the line items presented, classified in a manner appropriate to the entity’s operations. |
78 | The detail provided in subclassifications depends on the requirements of IFRSs and on the size, nature and function of the amounts involved. An entity also uses the factors set out in paragraph 58 to decide the basis of subclassification. The disclosures vary for each item, for example:
|
79 | An entity shall disclose the following, either in the statement of financial position or the statement of changes in equity, or in the notes:
|
80 | An entity without share capital, such as a partnership or trust, shall disclose information equivalent to that required by paragraph 79(a), showing changes during the period in each category of equity interest, and the rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each category of equity interest.
|
80A | If an entity has reclassified
between financial liabilities and equity, it shall disclose the amount reclassified into and out of each category (financial liabilities or equity), and the timing and reason for that reclassification.
|
81 | [Deleted] |
81A | The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (statement of comprehensive income) shall present, in addition to the profit or loss and other comprehensive income sections:
If an entity presents a separate statement of profit or loss it does not present the profit or loss section in the statement presenting comprehensive income. |
81B | An entity shall present the following items, in addition to the profit or loss and other comprehensive income sections, as allocation of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the period:
If an entity presents profit or loss in a separate statement it shall present (a) in that statement. |
82 | In addition to items required by other IFRSs, the profit or loss section or the statement of profit or loss shall include line items that present the following amounts for the period:
|
| E14 | [IFRIC® Update, March 2018, Agenda Decision, ‘Presentation of interest revenue for particular financial instruments (IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements)’ The Committee received a request about the effect of the consequential amendment that IFRS 9 made to paragraph 82(a) of IAS 1. That consequential amendment requires an entity to present separately, in the profit or loss section of the statement of comprehensive income or in the statement of profit or loss, interest revenue calculated using the effective interest method. The request asked whether that requirement affects the presentation of fair value gains and losses on derivative instruments that are not part of a designated and effective hedging relationship (applying the hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 or IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement). Appendix A to IFRS 9 defines the term ‘effective interest method’ and other related terms. Those interrelated terms pertain to the requirements in IFRS 9 for amortised cost measurement and the expected credit loss impairment model. In relation to financial assets, the Committee observed that the effective interest method is a measurement technique whose purpose is to calculate amortised cost and allocate interest revenue over the relevant time period. The Committee also observed that the expected credit loss impairment model in IFRS 9 is part of, and interlinked with, amortised cost accounting. The Committee noted that amortised cost accounting, including interest revenue calculated using the effective interest method and credit losses calculated using the expected credit loss impairment model, is applied only to financial assets that are subsequently measured at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income. In contrast, amortised cost accounting is not applied to financial assets that are subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss. Consequently, the Committee concluded that the requirement in paragraph 82(a) of IAS 1 to present separately an interest revenue line item calculated using the effective interest method applies only to those assets that are subsequently measured at amortised cost or fair value through other comprehensive income (subject to any effect of a qualifying hedging relationship applying the hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 or IAS 39). The Committee did not consider any other presentation requirements in IAS 1 or broader matters related to the presentation of other ‘interest’ amounts in the statement of comprehensive income. This is because the consequential amendment that IFRS 9 made to paragraph 82(a) of IAS 1 did not affect those matters. More specifically, the Committee did not consider whether an entity could present other interest amounts in the statement of comprehensive income, in addition to presenting the interest revenue line item required by paragraph 82(a) of IAS 1. The Committee concluded that the principles and requirements in IFRS Standards provide an adequate basis for an entity to apply paragraph 82(a) of IAS 1 and present separately, in the profit or loss section of the statement of comprehensive income or in the statement of profit or loss, interest revenue calculated using the effective interest method. Consequently, the Committee decided not to add this matter to its standard-setting agenda.] |
| E15 | [IFRIC® Update, July 2012, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IAS 12 Income Taxes—Presentation of payments on non-income taxes’ The IFRS Interpretations Committee received a request seeking clarification of whether production-based royalty payments payable to one taxation authority that are claimed as an allowance against taxable profit for the computation of income tax payable to another taxation authority should be presented as an operating expense or a tax expense in the statement of comprehensive income. As the basis for this request, the submitter assumed that the production-based royalty payments are, in themselves, outside the scope of IAS 12 Income Taxes while the income tax payable to the other taxation authority is within the scope of IAS 12. On the basis of this assumption, the submitter asks the Committee to clarify whether the production-based royalty payments can be viewed as prepayment of the income tax payable. The Committee used the same assumption when discussing the issue. The Committee observed that the line item of ‘tax expense’ that is required by paragraph 82(d) of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements is intended to require an entity to present taxes that meet the definition of income taxes under IAS 12. The Committee also noted that it is the basis of calculation determined by the relevant tax rules that determines whether a tax meets the definition of an income tax. Neither the manner of settlement of a tax liability nor the factors relating to recipients of the tax is a determinant of whether an item meets that definition. The Committee further noted that the production-based royalty payments should not be treated differently from other expenses that are outside the scope of IAS 12, all of which may reduce income tax payable. Accordingly, the Committee observed that it is inappropriate to consider the royalty payments to be prepayment of the income tax payables. Because the production-based royalties are not income taxes, the royalty payments should not be presented as an income tax expense in the statement of comprehensive income. The Committee considered that, in the light of its analysis of the existing requirements of IAS 1 and IAS 12, an interpretation was not necessary and consequently decided not to add this issue to its agenda.] |
82A | The other comprehensive income section shall present line items for the amounts for the period of:
|
83–84 | [Deleted] |
85 | An entity shall present additional line items (including by disaggregating the line items listed in paragraph 82), headings and subtotals in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other comprehensive income when such presentation is relevant [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] to an understanding of the entity’s financial performance.E16 [Refer:
Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC38D and, for background, paragraphs BC38A–BC38C]
|
| E16 | [IFRIC® Update, January 2015, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements—Income and expenses arising on financial instruments with a negative yield—presentation in the statement of comprehensive income’ The Interpretations Committee discussed the ramifications of the economic phenomenon of negative effective interest rates for the presentation of income and expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. The Interpretations Committee noted that interest resulting from a negative effective interest rate on a financial asset does not meet the definition of interest revenue in IAS 18 Revenue [IAS 18 has been withdrawn. Paragraph 4.2 of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting contains a definition of income], because it reflects a gross outflow, instead of a gross inflow, of economic benefits. Consequently, the expense arising on a financial asset because of a negative effective interest rate should not be presented as interest revenue, but in an appropriate expense classification. The Interpretations Committee noted that in accordance with paragraphs 85 and 112(c) of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, the entity is required to present additional information about such an amount if that is relevant to an understanding of the entity’s financial performance or to an understanding of this item. The Interpretations Committee considered that in the light of the existing IFRS requirements an interpretation was not necessary and consequently decided not to add the issue to its agenda.] |
85A | When an entity presents subtotals in accordance with paragraph 85, those subtotals shall:
|
85B | An entity shall present the line items in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other comprehensive income that reconcile any subtotals presented in accordance with paragraph 85 with the subtotals or totals required in IFRS for such statement(s). |
86 | Because the effects of an entity’s various activities, transactions and other events differ in frequency, potential for gain or loss and predictability, disclosing the components of financial performance assists users in understanding the financial performance achieved and in making projections of future financial performance. An entity includes additional line items in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other comprehensive income and it amends the descriptions used and the ordering of items when this is necessary to explain the elements of financial performance. An entity considers factors including materiality [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraph 2.11] and the nature and function of the items of income and expense. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 4.68-4.72] For example, a financial institution may amend the descriptions to provide information that is relevant to the operations of a financial institution. An entity does not offset income and expense items unless the criteria in paragraph 32 are met. |
87 | An entity shall not present any items of income or expense [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 4.68-4.72] as extraordinary items, in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other comprehensive income or in the notes. |
88 | An entity shall recognise all items of income and expense in a period in profit or loss unless an IFRS requires or permits otherwise. |
89 | Some IFRSs specify circumstances when an entity recognises particular items outside profit or loss in the current period. IAS 8 specifies two such circumstances: the correction of errors [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 41–48] and the effect of changes in accounting policies. [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 14–31] Other IFRSs require or permit components of other comprehensive income that meet the Conceptual Framework’s definition of income or expense to be excluded from profit or loss (see paragraph 7). |
90 | An entity shall disclose the amount of income tax relating to each item of other comprehensive income, including reclassification adjustments, either in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income [Refer:paragraphs 81–105] or in the notes. [Refer:paragraphs 112–138]
|
91 | An entity may present items of other comprehensive income either:
If an entity elects alternative (b), it shall allocate the tax between the items that might be reclassified subsequently to the profit or loss section and those that will not be reclassified subsequently to the profit or loss section. [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC68A and BC54L]
|
92 | An entity shall disclose reclassification adjustments relating to components of other comprehensive income.
|
93 | Other IFRSs specify whether and when amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss. Such reclassifications are referred to in this Standard as reclassification adjustments. A reclassification adjustment is included with the related component of other comprehensive income in the period that the adjustment is reclassified to profit or loss. These amounts may have been recognised in other comprehensive income as unrealised gains in the current or previous periods. Those unrealised gains must be deducted from other comprehensive income in the period in which the realised gains are reclassified to profit or loss to avoid including them in total comprehensive income twice. |
94 | An entity may present reclassification adjustments in the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income or in the notes. [Refer:paragraphs 112–138] An entity presenting reclassification adjustments in the notes presents the items of other comprehensive income after any related reclassification adjustments. |
95 | Reclassification adjustments arise, for example, on disposal of a foreign operation (see IAS 21) and when some hedged forecast cash flows affect profit or loss (see paragraph 6.5.11(d) of IFRS 9 in relation to cash flow hedges). |
96 | Reclassification adjustments do not arise on changes in revaluation surplus recognised in accordance with IAS 16 or IAS 38 or on remeasurements of defined benefit plans recognised in accordance with IAS 19. These components are recognised in other comprehensive income and are not reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods. Changes in revaluation surplus [Refer:IAS 16 paragraphs 39–42] may be transferred to retained earnings in subsequent periods as the asset is used or when it is derecognised (see IAS 16 and IAS 38). In accordance with IFRS 9, reclassification adjustments do not arise if a cash flow hedge or the accounting for the time value of an option (or the forward element of a forward contract or the foreign currency basis spread of a financial instrument) result in amounts that are removed from the cash flow hedge reserve or a separate component of equity, respectively, and included directly in the initial cost or other carrying amount of an asset or a liability. These amounts are directly transferred to assets or liabilities. [Refer:IFRS 9 paragraph 6.5.11(d)(i)] |
97 | When items of income or expense are [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 4.68-4.72] material, an entity shall disclose their nature and amount separately. |
98 | Circumstances that would give rise to the separate disclosure of items of income and expense include:
|
99 | An entity shall present an analysis of expenses recognised in profit or loss using a classification based on either their nature or their function within the entity, whichever provides information that is reliableE17 and more relevant. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11]
|
| E17 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
100 | Entities are encouraged to present the analysis in paragraph 99 in the statement(s) presenting profit or loss and other comprehensive income. |
101 | Expenses are subclassified to highlight components of financial performance that may differ in terms of frequency, potential for gain or loss and predictability. This analysis is provided in one of two forms. |
102 | The first form of analysis is the ‘nature of expense’ method. An entity aggregates expenses within profit or loss according to their nature (for example, depreciation, purchases of materials, transport costs, employee benefits and advertising costs), and does not reallocate them among functions within the entity. This method may be simple to apply because no allocations of expenses to functional classifications are necessary. An example of a classification using the nature of expense method is as follows:
|
103 | The second form of analysis is the ‘function of expense’ or ‘cost of sales’ method and classifies expenses according to their function as part of cost of sales or, for example, the costs of distribution or administrative activities. At a minimum, an entity discloses its cost of sales under this method separately from other expenses. This method can provide more relevant information [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] to users than the classification of expenses by nature, but allocating costs to functions may require arbitrary allocations and involve considerable judgement. An example of a classification using the function of expense method is as follows:
|
104 | An entity classifying expenses by function shall disclose additional information on the nature of expenses, including depreciation and amortisation expense and employee benefits expense.
|
105 | The choice between the function of expense method and the nature of expense method depends on historical and industry factors and the nature of the entity. Both methods provide an indication of those costs that might vary, directly or indirectly, with the level of sales or production of the entity. Because each method of presentation has merit for different types of entities, this Standard requires management to select the presentation that is reliableE18 and more relevant. [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.6-2.11] However, because information on the nature of expenses is useful in predicting future cash flows, additional disclosure is required when the function of expense classification is used. In paragraph 104, ‘employee benefits’ has the same meaning as in IAS 19. |
| E18 | [The term ‘faithful representation’, which was used in the Conceptual Framework issued in 2010 and is also used in the revised version of the Conceptual Framework issued in 2018, encompasses the main characteristics that the Framework called ‘reliability’ (refer Conceptual Framework paragraphs 2.12–2.19 and Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC2.21–BC2.31 and IAS 1 Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105J).] |
106 | An entity shall present a statement of changes in equity as required by paragraph 10. The statement of changes in equity includes the following information:
|
106A | For each component of equity an entity shall present, either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes, an analysis of other comprehensive income by item (see paragraph 106(d)(ii)).
|
107 | An entity shall present, either in the statement of changes in equity or in the notes, the amount of dividends recognised as distributions to owners during the period, and the related amount of dividends per share.
|
108 | In paragraph 106, the components of equity include, for example, each class of contributed equity, the accumulated balance of each class of other comprehensive income and retained earnings.
|
109 | Changes in an entity’s equity between the beginning and the end of the reporting period reflect the increase or decrease in its net assets during the period. Except for changes resulting from transactions with owners in their capacity as owners (such as equity contributions, reacquisitions of the entity’s own equity instruments and dividends) and transaction costs directly related to such transactions, the overall change in equity during a period represents the total amount of income and expense, including gains and losses, generated by the entity’s activities during that period. |
110 | IAS 8 requires retrospective adjustments to effect changes in accounting policies, to the extent practicable, except when the transition provisions in another IFRS require otherwise. [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 19–27 and 50–53] IAS 8 also requires restatements to correct errors to be made retrospectively, [Refer:IAS 8 paragraphs 43–48 and 50–53] to the extent practicable. Retrospective adjustments and retrospective restatements are not changes in equity but they are adjustments to the opening balance of retained earnings, except when an IFRS requires retrospective adjustment of another component of equity. Paragraph 106(b) requires disclosure in the statement of changes in equity of the total adjustment to each component of equity resulting from changes in accounting policies and, separately, from corrections of errors. These adjustments are disclosed for each prior period and the beginning of the period. |
111 | Cash flow information provides users [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2-1.10 and 2.36] of financial statements with a basis to assess the ability of the entity to generate cash and cash equivalents and the needs of the entity to utilise those cash flows. IAS 7 sets out requirements for the presentation and disclosure of cash flow information. |
112 | The notes shall:
|
113 | An entity shall, as far as practicable, present notes in a systematic manner. In determining a systematic manner, the entity shall consider the effect on the understandability and comparability of its financial statements. An entity shall cross‑reference each item in the statements of financial position and in the statement(s) of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, and in the statements of changes in equity and of cash flows to any related information in the notes. |
114 | Examples of systematic ordering or grouping of the notes include:
|
115 | [Deleted] |
116 | An entity may present notes providing information about the basis of preparation of the financial statements and specific accounting policies [Refer:paragraph 117] as a separate section of the financial statements. |
117 | An entity shall disclose its significant accounting policies comprising:
|
118 | It is important for an entity to inform users of the measurement basis or bases [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 6.4-6.22] used in the financial statements (for example, historical cost, current cost, net realisable value, fair value or recoverable amount) because the basis on which an entity prepares the financial statements significantly affects users’ analysis. When an entity uses more than one measurement basis in the financial statements, for example when particular classes of assets are revalued, [Refer:for example, IAS 16 paragraph 31] it is sufficient to provide an indication of the categories of assets [Refer:for example, IAS 16 paragraph 37] and liabilities to which each measurement basis is applied. |
119 | In deciding whether a particular accounting policy should be disclosed, management considers whether disclosure would assist users in understanding how transactions, other events and conditions are reflected in reported financial performance and financial position. Each entity considers the nature of its operations and the policies that the users of its financial statements would expect to be disclosed for that type of entity. Disclosure of particular accounting policies is especially useful to users when those policies are selected from alternatives allowed in IFRSs. An example is disclosure of whether an entity applies the fair value or cost model to its investment property (see IAS 40 Investment Property). [Refer:IAS 40 paragraph 30] Some IFRSs specifically require disclosure of particular accounting policies, including choices made by management between different policies they allow. For example, IAS 16 requires disclosure of the measurement bases used for classes of property, plant and equipment [Refer:IAS 16 paragraph 73(a)]. |
120 | [Deleted] [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC76F and BC76G] |
121 | An accounting policy may be significant because of the nature of the entity’s operations even if amounts for current and prior periods are not material. It is also appropriate to disclose each significant accounting policy that is not specifically required by IFRSs but the entity selects and applies in accordance with IAS 8. [Refer:IAS 8 paragraph 7–12] |
122 | An entity shall disclose, along with its significant accounting policies or other notes, the judgements, apart from those involving estimations (see paragraph 125), that management has made in the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.E19
|
| E19 | [IFRIC® Update, November 2013, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 19 Employee Benefit—Actuarial assumptions: discount rate’ The Interpretations Committee discussed a request for guidance on the determination of the rate used to discount post-employment benefit obligations. The submitter stated that:
In the light of the points above, the submitter asked the Interpretations Committee whether corporate bonds with a rating lower than ‘AA’ can be considered to be HQCB. The Interpretations Committee observed that IAS 19 does not specify how to determine the market yields on HQCB, and in particular what grade of bonds should be designated as high quality. The Interpretations Committee considers that an entity should take into account the guidance in paragraphs 84 and 85 of IAS 19 (2011) in determining what corporate bonds can be considered to be HQCB. Paragraphs 84 and 85 of IAS 19 (2011) state that the discount rate:
The Interpretations Committee further noted that ‘high quality’ as used in paragraph 83 of IAS 19 reflects an absolute concept of credit quality and not a concept of credit quality that is relative to a given population of corporate bonds, which would be the case, for example, if the paragraph used the term ‘the highest quality’. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee observed that the concept of high quality should not change over time. Accordingly, a reduction in the number of HQCB should not result in a change to the concept of high quality. The Interpretations Committee does not expect that an entity’s methods and techniques used for determining the discount rate so as to reflect the yields on HQCB will change significantly from period to period. Paragraphs 83 and 86 of IAS 19, respectively, contain requirements if the market in HQCB is no longer deep or if the market remains deep overall, but there is an insufficient number of HQCB beyond a certain maturity. The Interpretations Committee also noted that:
The Interpretations Committee discussed this issue in several meetings and noted that issuing additional guidance on, or changing the requirements for, the determination of the discount rate would be too broad for it to address in an efficient manner. The Interpretations Committee therefore recommends that this issue should be addressed in the IASB’s research project on discount rates. Consequently, the Interpretations Committee decided not to add this issue to its agenda.] |
123 | In the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies, management makes various judgements, apart from those involving estimations, that can significantly affect the amounts it recognises in the financial statements. For example, management makes judgements in determining:
|
124 | Some of the disclosures made in accordance with paragraph 122 are required by other IFRSs. For example, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities requires an entity to disclose the judgements it has made in determining whether it controls another entity. IAS 40 Investment Property requires disclosure of the criteria developed by the entity to distinguish investment property from owner‑occupied property and from property held for sale in the ordinary course of business, when classification of the property is difficult [Refer:IAS 40 paragraph 75(c)]. |
125 | An entity shall disclose information about the assumptions it makes about the future, and other major sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. In respect of those assets and liabilities, the notes shall include details of:
|
126 | Determining the carrying amounts of some assets and liabilities requires estimation of the effects of uncertain future events on those assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period. For example, in the absence of recently observed market prices, future‑oriented estimates are necessary to measure the recoverable amount of classes of property, plant and equipment, the effect of technological obsolescence on inventories, provisions subject to the future outcome of litigation in progress, and long‑term employee benefit liabilities such as pension obligations. These estimates involve assumptions about such items as the risk adjustment to cash flows or discount rates, future changes in salaries and future changes in prices affecting other costs. |
127 | The assumptions and other sources of estimation uncertainty disclosed in accordance with paragraph 125 relate to the estimates that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgements. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future resolution of the uncertainties increases, those judgements become more subjective and complex, and the potential for a consequential material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities normally increases accordingly. |
128 | The disclosures in paragraph 125 are not required for assets and liabilities with a significant risk that their carrying amounts might change materially within the next financial year if, at the end of the reporting period, they are measured at fair value based on a quoted price in an active market [Refer:IFRS 13 Appendix A (definition of an active market)] for an identical asset or liability. [Refer:IFRS 13 paragraph 76] Such fair values might change materially within the next financial year but these changes would not arise from assumptions or other sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period. |
129 | An entity presents the disclosures in paragraph 125 in a manner that helps users [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2-1.10 and 2.36] of financial statements to understand the judgements that management makes about the future and about other sources of estimation uncertainty. The nature and extent of the information provided vary according to the nature of the assumption and other circumstances. Examples of the types of disclosures an entity makes are:
|
130 | This Standard does not require an entity to disclose budget information or forecasts in making the disclosures in paragraph 125. |
131 | Sometimes it is impracticable to disclose the extent of the possible effects of an assumption or another source of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period. In such cases, the entity discloses that it is reasonably possible, on the basis of existing knowledge, that outcomes within the next financial year that are different from the assumption could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected. In all cases, the entity discloses the nature and carrying amount of the specific asset or liability (or class of assets or liabilities) affected by the assumption. |
132 | The disclosures in paragraph 122 of particular judgements that management made in the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies do not relate to the disclosures of sources of estimation uncertainty in paragraph 125. |
133 | Other IFRSs require the disclosure of some of the assumptions that would otherwise be required in accordance with paragraph 125. For example, IAS 37 requires disclosure, in specified circumstances, of major assumptions concerning future events affecting classes of provisions. [Refer:IAS 37 paragraph 85(b)] IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement requires disclosure of significant assumptions (including the valuation technique(s) [Refer:IFRS 13 paragraphs 61 and 62] and inputs [Refer:IFRS 13 paragraph 67]) the entity uses when measuring the fair values of assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value. |
134 | An entity shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital.
|
135 | To comply with paragraph 134, the entity discloses the following:
The entity bases these disclosures on the information provided internally to key management personnel. |
136 | An entity may manage capital in a number of ways and be subject to a number of different capital requirements. For example, a conglomerate may include entities that undertake insurance activities and banking activities and those entities may operate in several jurisdictions. When an aggregate disclosure of capital requirements and how capital is managed would not provide useful information or distorts a financial statement user’s [Refer:Conceptual Framework paragraphs 1.2-1.10 and 2.36] understanding of an entity’s capital resources, the entity shall disclose separate information for each capital requirement to which the entity is subject.
|
136A | For puttable financial instruments classified as equity instruments, an entity shall disclose (to the extent not disclosed elsewhere):
|
137 | An entity shall disclose in the notes:
|
138 | An entity shall disclose the following, if not disclosed elsewhere in information published with the financial statements:
|
139 | An entity shall apply this Standard for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity adopts this Standard for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. |
139A | IAS 27 (as amended in 2008) amended paragraph 106. An entity shall apply that amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2009. If an entity applies IAS 27 (amended 2008) for an earlier period, the amendment shall be applied for that earlier period. The amendment shall be applied retrospectively. |
139B | Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation (Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1), issued in February 2008, amended paragraph 138 and inserted paragraphs 8A, 80A and 136A. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies the amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact and apply the related amendments to IAS 32, IAS 39, IFRS 7 and IFRIC 2 Members’ Shares in Co‑operative Entities and Similar Instruments at the same time. |
139C | Paragraphs 68 and 71 were amended by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2008. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies the amendments for an earlier period it shall disclose that fact. |
139D | [Deleted] |
139E | [Deleted] |
139F | Paragraphs 106 and 107 were amended and paragraph 106A was added by Improvements to IFRSs issued in May 2010. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Earlier application is permitted. |
139G | [Deleted] |
139H |
139I | IFRS 13, issued in May 2011, amended paragraphs 128 and 133. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 13. |
139J | Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (Amendments to IAS 1), issued in June 2011, amended paragraphs 7, 10, 82, 85–87, 90, 91, 94, 100 and 115, added paragraphs 10A, 81A, 81B and 82A, and deleted paragraphs 12, 81, 83 and 84. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies the amendments for an earlier period it shall disclose that fact. |
139K | IAS 19 Employee Benefits (as amended in June 2011) amended the definition of ‘other comprehensive income’ in paragraph 7 and paragraph 96. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IAS 19 (as amended in June 2011). |
139L | Annual Improvements 2009–2011 Cycle, issued in May 2012, amended paragraphs 10, 38 and 41, deleted paragraphs 39–40 and added paragraphs 38A–38D and 40A–40D. An entity shall apply that amendment retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies that amendment for an earlier period it shall disclose that fact. |
139M | [Deleted] |
139N | IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, issued in May 2014, amended paragraph 34. An entity shall apply that amendment when it applies IFRS 15. |
139O | IFRS 9, as issued in July 2014, amended paragraphs 7, 68, 71, 82, 93, 95, 96, 106 and 123 and deleted paragraphs 139E, 139G and 139M. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 9. |
139P | Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 1), issued in December 2014, amended paragraphs 10, 31, 54–55, 82A, 85, 113–114, 117, 119 and 122, added paragraphs 30A, 55A and 85A–85B and deleted paragraphs 115 and 120. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016. Earlier application is permitted. [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraph BC105C] Entities are not required to disclose the information required by paragraphs 28–30 of IAS 8 in relation to these amendments. [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC105D–BC105F] |
139Q | IFRS 16 Leases, issued in January 2016, amended paragraph 123. An entity shall apply that amendment when it applies IFRS 16. |
139R | IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, amended paragraphs 7, 54 and 82. Amendments to IFRS 17, issued in June 2020, further amended paragraph 54. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 17. |
139S | Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards, issued in 2018, amended paragraphs 7, 15, 19–20, 23–24, 28 and 89. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2020. Earlier application is permitted if at the same time an entity also applies all other amendments made by Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards. An entity shall apply the amendments to IAS 1 retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. However, if an entity determines that retrospective application would be impracticable or would involve undue cost or effort, it shall apply the amendments to IAS 1 by reference to paragraphs 23–28, 50–53 and 54F of IAS 8. |
139T | Definition of Material (Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8), issued in October 2018, amended paragraph 7 of IAS 1 and paragraph 5 of IAS 8, and deleted paragraph 6 of IAS 8. An entity shall apply those amendments prospectively for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2020. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. |
139U | Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current, issued in January 2020 amended paragraphs 69, 73, 74 and 76 and added paragraphs 72A, 75A, 76A and 76B. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023 retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8. [Refer:Basis for Conclusions paragraphs BC105FA–BC105FC] Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. |
140 | This Standard supersedes IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements revised in 2003, as amended in 2005. |
The amendments in this appendix shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. If an entity applies this Standard for an earlier period, these amendments shall be applied for that earlier period. In the amended paragraphs, new text is underlined and deleted text is struck through.
| * * * * * |
The amendments contained in this appendix when this Standard was revised in 2007 have been incorporated into the relevant pronouncements published in this volume.
International Accounting Standard 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (as revised in 2007) was approved for issue by ten of the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Professor Barth and Messrs Cope, Garnett and Leisenring dissented. Their dissenting opinions are set out after the Basis for Conclusions.
| Sir David Tweedie | Chairman |
| Thomas E Jones | Vice‑Chairman |
| Mary E Barth | |
| Hans‑Georg Bruns | |
| Anthony T Cope | |
| Philippe Danjou | |
| Jan Engström | |
| Robert P Garnett | |
| Gilbert Gélard | |
| James J Leisenring | |
| Warren J McGregor | |
| Patricia L O’Malley | |
| John T Smith | |
| Tatsumi Yamada |
Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation (Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements) was approved for issue by eleven of the thirteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Professor Barth and Mr Garnett dissented. Their dissenting opinions are set out after the Basis for Conclusions on IAS 32.
| Sir David Tweedie | Chairman |
| Thomas E Jones | Vice‑Chairman |
| Mary E Barth | |
| Stephen Cooper | |
| Philippe Danjou | |
| Jan Engström | |
| Robert P Garnett | |
| Gilbert Gélard | |
| James J Leisenring | |
| Warren J McGregor | |
| John T Smith | |
| Tatsumi Yamada | |
| Wei‑Guo Zhang |
Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income (Amendments to IAS 1) was approved for issue by fourteen of the fifteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Mr Pacter dissented from the issue of the amendments. His dissenting opinion is set out after the Basis for Conclusions.
| Sir David Tweedie | Chairman |
| Stephen Cooper | |
| Philippe Danjou | |
| Jan Engström | |
| Patrick Finnegan | |
| Amaro Luiz de Oliveira Gomes | |
| Prabhakar Kalavacherla | |
| Elke König | |
| Patricia McConnell | |
| Warren J McGregor | |
| Paul Pacter | |
| Darrel Scott | |
| John T Smith | |
| Tatsumi Yamada | |
| Wei-Guo Zhang |
Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 1) was approved for publication by fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
| Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman |
| Ian Mackintosh | Vice-Chairman |
| Stephen Cooper | |
| Philippe Danjou | |
| Amaro Luiz De Oliveira Gomes | |
| Martin Edelmann | |
| Patrick Finnegan | |
| Gary Kabureck | |
| Suzanne Lloyd | |
| Takatsugu Ochi | |
| Darrel Scott | |
| Chungwoo Suh | |
| Mary Tokar | |
| Wei-Guo Zhang |
Definition of Material (Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8) was approved for issue by the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
| Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman |
| Suzanne Lloyd | Vice‑Chair |
| Nick Anderson | |
| Martin Edelmann | |
| Françoise Flores | |
| Amaro Luiz de Oliveira Gomes | |
| Gary Kabureck | |
| Jianqiao Lu | |
| Takatsugu Ochi | |
| Darrel Scott | |
| Thomas Scott | |
| Chungwoo Suh | |
| Ann Tarca | |
| Mary Tokar |
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current, which amended IAS 1, was approved for issue by all 14 members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
| Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman |
| Suzanne Lloyd | Vice-Chair |
| Nick Anderson | |
| Tadeu Cendon | |
| Martin Edelmann | |
| Françoise Flores | |
| Gary Kabureck | |
| Jianqiao Lu | |
| Darrel Scott | |
| Thomas Scott | |
| Chungwoo Suh | |
| Rika Suzuki | |
| Ann Tarca | |
| Mary Tokar |
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current—Deferral of Effective Date, which amended IAS 1, was approved for issue by all 14 members of the International Accounting Standards Board.
| Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman |
| Suzanne Lloyd | Vice-Chair |
| Nick Anderson | |
| Tadeu Cendon | |
| Martin Edelmann | |
| Françoise Flores | |
| Gary Kabureck | |
| Jianqiao Lu | |
| Darrel Scott | |
| Thomas Scott | |
| Chungwoo Suh | |
| Rika Suzuki | |
| Ann Tarca | |
| Mary Tokar |
| 1 | Definition of IFRSs amended after the name changes introduced by the revised Constitution of the IFRS Foundation in 2010. (back) |